The Controversial Conclusion of the Famous Manga Oshi no Ko
Recently, the author of the acclaimed manga reported inaccurate page count details for the final volume, sparking a new controversy among its followers. This misinformation has caused anxiety and discontent within the fan community, who worry that such inaccuracies could compromise the quality of a story that has been consistently successful.
Disappointment Among Dedicated Fans
Manga fans, known for their loyalty and enthusiasm, quickly voiced their disappointment on social media. They pointed out that such fundamental information should be handled with greater accuracy, especially for a series of this magnitude. Many are concerned that this oversight indicates organizational issues in the story’s conclusion, potentially leaving long-time followers dissatisfied.
The error regarding the page count of Oshi no Ko spread rapidly after a fan posted on X/Twitter, expressing outrage over the situation. In their post, the user emphasized that it is troubling that the fandom itself has to correct such details, which should come directly from the author or official sources.
This post quickly garnered thousands of reactions and comments, reflecting a widespread discomfort due to the lack of accuracy on such an important issue for the series’ followers.
In addition to the confusion over the page count, many fans began to voice concerns about a rushed conclusion for Oshi no Ko. The uncertainty regarding the page count has fueled speculation that the author intended to conclude the story hastily, which could impact the quality and development of the final plot points. There is considerable concern that if the series’ ending is not handled correctly, it could leave fans dissatisfied after investing so much time in the storyline.
Despite the controversies arising from the page count error and concerns about a rushed ending, Oshi no Ko is gradually reaching its conclusion. While some fans welcome the finale for its emotional depth and surprises, others feel that the story ended abruptly, lacking the detailed development they feared. They argue that author Aka Akasaka has not fulfilled the role of creating a reasonable conclusion for the series.
